Insensitive Legislation

Having grown up in Santa Monica my whole life, it pains me at times to see how rapidly the city is changing. Some changes such as increased industry, more tourism, better shops, and beautiful scenery have helped to make this town the envy of many neighboring cities, but when

we begin to forget the values that made this town great, we jeopardize our future. Santa Monica has been known (as far back as I can remember), as a town where everyone has a place; the rich, the famous, the hippies, surfers, skaters, people of all different races and religions and the poor and homeless.

Although some of these people on the surface may seem less attractive than others, it is all of us, as a collective whole, which make this small, quaint beach town so desirable and special.
It is this uniqueness and acceptance of all people that is being jeopardized right now in our local City Hall. There are currently two city ordinances pending that, if passed, would affect the homeless: One would require every organization planning to feed more than 150 homeless people to file a permit with the city requiring the organizations to abide by community event laws and county health standards. The other would make it illegal to sit or lie in the doorways of businesses.

Now, although I cannot say that I think we should allow people to sleep in doorways, I cannot agree with the ordinances limiting the feeding of homeless and poor throughout our community. Our country is going through tough economic times right now, and many are finding it a lot harder to make ends meet. These non-profit organizations and faith-based groups (many of which are based in neighboring communities), are coming into Santa Monica, and supplying food not only for homeless people, but lower income families and seniors on fixed incomes. Many people rely on these brown bag lunches to keep them afloat.

The problem with homelessness is not so much the people, but the fact that it can make many of us feel uncomfortable. I don’t think the majority of residents want to get rid of the homeless, rather it seems many are just a little fed up with the panhandling and constant “in your face” attitude, and don’t know a better solution. I have always been someone who empathized with those who were less fortunate, and it does pain me when I offer food as opposed to money, and I get responses like “I don’t want your f------ apple.” That kind of stuff is hard to hear, but for every person who has ever responded to me so harshly, there are at least 15 others that upon receiving my packaged up doggy bags are sincerely grateful and appreciative. It has become a habit for me when leaving a restaurant to package my leftovers, request a knife, fork, and napkin to go, and then proceed to find someone on the street with which to share. The people are typically so thankful, not because I’m giving them food, but more in part because of the effort I put into it. I get them utensils, I introduce myself, and I show that I have an interest in them. I treat them like I would any other human being (sometimes even better), and that is what’s important.

If we cut off these services and criminalize where people seek shelter, are we solving a problem or just creating animosity? The city of Santa Monica has been given a wonderful opportunity to lead by example. So much of our homeless issue is a result of other surrounding cities not doing their jobs and placing their problem in our hands, it is our responsibility to work with these people to help get them back on their feet, and educate others on how to do it within their communities.

I was fortunate enough to be able to attend a benefit this last Friday morning for the Westside Shelter and Hunger Coalition that honored about 25 people who have turned their lives around and managed to get off the streets. They are all employed and living lives that they hadn’t thought possible just a short time ago. Some of those who received awards were the type of homeless individual that most find “OK.” They aren’t alcoholics or drug addicts, they don’t talk to themselves, and they don’t smell “too” badly. It’s sad that we have been programmed to believe that some are more deserving than others because they look cleaner. The best part about the ceremony was to see the many individuals recognized for having overcome “multiple-barriers.” These individuals made up a large part of the honorees. People who had been in and out of jail, on Skid Row, crack addicts and alcoholics, and those suffering mental illness. These were the individuals of which I was proudest. Many of those walking our local city streets were once institutionalized mental patients, released to the streets in the eighties when the Reagan Administration cut federal funding to mental hospitals. I don’t know about you but living on the streets, alone, and hungry would drive me to insanity, now imagine if you were already mentally ill.

Twenty years later we find ourselves in a familiar place yet again. Our friend George W. is in office, big business is doing reasonably well (especially if your in the business of making missiles), and our homeless situation and poverty are increasing. It is unfortunate, but to turn our backs on these people would be the real crime. Although we are a very economically, ethnically, politically, and religiously, diverse community, we have always been one that looks out for the underdog, and assisted those less fortunate. In this day of Gucci clad 12-year-olds, and babies with stock options it is important that we not lose sight of the principles for which this community stands.