Santa Monica College
Classified
Senate
Request to move action items to front of meeting. Mark Stemock needs to
leave shortly. Craig Walters moves to move them. Lee Peterson seconds. Voted on
- unanimously approved by body.
Adoption of Mission Statement – approve as amended. Second draft. Craig
moves to go into statement. Robert Ponce seconds motion. Barbara Siegel would
like to change ‘function’ to ‘auspices’; Lee suggested “under the
scope”; Phil Hendricks said “purview” of CSEA. No other changes other than
those. *See Mission Statement. Barbara asked for last part of #4 to be taken
out. She is concerned with the Senate limiting itself to the 2003-2004 year
only. No date should be included. Lee seconds the motion to drop 2003-2004.
Craig moved we accept plan of action and statement in action in interest of
time. Lee seconds the motion.
Additional amendment to #1 by Phil. Barbara seconds the motion to amend.
Define the role. Yes – 9; No – 3; Abstentions – 6 – Motion passes.
Back to main motion accepting Mission Statement as amended. Yes – 15; No
– 0; Abstentions – 3. Motion passes. Mission Statement will go back to
committee.
Second Action Item: Scholarship set up by Senate. A committee is needed.
Craig moves for one. Robert seconds motion to set up committee. Discussion.
Question as to whether we are interested in setting up a committee so that we
can set up a scholarship. Vote taken on motion for a scholarship committee. Yes
– 18; No – 0; Abstentions – 1. Motion passes
Old Business: Professional Development Committee – We need to fill it. Ana is on it.
Will e-mail Jim to see if he’d like to attend. Amelia would like to go.
Social Committee: Marilyn & Maria are active.
Duties and responsibilities: A code of ethics. Ana found Academic Senate
credo – open for discussion. Barbara said this code of ethics for the Academic
Senate came from issue with Coordinating Council from months ago…what is
guiding vision of anyone who represents Senate? Discussion followed. Code of
Ethics – CSEA involvement. Lee mentioned respect in professionalism. Carl
Gettleman said most people were in favor of an Ombudsman for staff. Discussion
occurred on how to respond to questions in committee meetings as a Senate
representative – not as an individual. More discussion was generated. Phil
went back to Senate responses to committees. Barbara mentioned that the
Ombudsman came up with the Board dialog. Ana would like to head committee of
ethics ombudsman and Senate reps in campus environment. She said we need to
think of whom we are representing at all times. Also, anything to do with
collective bargaining will go to President of CSEA.
Craig moved to reopen motion of ethics to committee. Lee seconded. Tom
Carter wants to know if this is something Administration would hold us to. The
answer is that this would be internal to Senate only – nothing District could
hold us to. Ana will take it back to Mission Statement Committee.
Vote on forming Ethics Committee: Yes – 9; No – 6; Abstentions – 1.
Passes. Tony Prestby mentioned that there might be a code of ethics from a while
back.
Adjournment: 1:05pm
Attendees: Maria Bonin, Tom Carter, Linda
Davis, Carol Evans, Carl Gettleman, Marilyn Goodrich, Jeanette Goolsby, Joanne
Guercio, Phil Hendricks, Ana Jara, Martha Jimenez, Lee Peterson, Robert Ponce,
Jackie Portal-Purdy, Barbara Siegel, Gayle Sosa, Mark Stemock
Amelia Trejo, Craig Walter. Excused: Jim
Galligan, Herb McNeely, Adam Philipson, Leonid Reytblat, Alex Siefert, Bernie
Rosenloecher, Guests: Giovanni Vela, Melvon George, Tony Prestby
Next
Meeting: Wednesday, February 11, 2004, Noon, B-111